Finally,
a glimmer of light has dawned at the end of a provocative and fascinating
tunnel. There will still be twists and turns aplenty,
no doubt. While reading chapters 4, 5,
and 6, it was helpful to me to think of a qualitative research idea that
interests me. It may or not be the one I
ultimately choose (or I may choose many), but, by superimposing my thoughts
over the skein of pathways presented, I was better able to better comprehend
the five approaches presented.
I
had been drawn to the narrative approach. The story of Vonnie Lee was
liberating in a number of ways. The
answer to Vonnie Lee’s fascination with the symbol of the heart was hidden in
the normal presuppositions that I would certainly have held along with the author. However, the author was able to step outside
of his training and prejudice to come to a delightful understanding: the young man was just tickled to ride the badly
scheduled bus. My father once said “Don’t
feel sorry for people because you would be devastated to find yourself in their
circumstances. They may be happier than
any of us will ever be.” Despite Vonnie
Lee’s challenging circumstances, there were things that made him very
happy. The author was unknowingly able
to facilitate and later understand the hidden meanings. My idea of working with college students who
have Attention Deficit Disorder and are trying to come to terms with life away
from the schedule and aid of family members might not fit into the narrative
schema, but I certainly gained a new kind of sensitivity and focus from reading
Vonnie Lee's study.
The phenomenological study about persons
with Auto Immune Deficiency Disorder could probably jive with some of my
thoughts about students with ADD. There
could be systematic data analysis and a central phenomenon. I like that the authors set aside their own
experiences to explore the lived experiences of their subjects. So, yes, there is a possibility. But a larger number of subjects was required
for this study compared to the narrative study. The
grounded study of women who had suffered sexual abuse was systematic and
scientific, but there was much care and sensitivity taken with the subjects. Might I develop a theoretical model and
relate it to the research I have done about secondary students trying to cope
with post-secondary education settings?
Perhaps, but I needed to know more.
I have always enjoyed reading ethnographic studies, way before I had any
idea what the term meant. The research
of Margaret Mead is fascinating. Would I
spend months or years immersed in a subculture?
Probably not right now. What a
thought for future studies! The case study,
with a system bounded by time and place to create a complex picture, might be
tweaked to work with my idea. I read
on. The idea that each type of study
involved a special type of focus was causing me to become a bit more focused.
Chapter 6 brought it all home for me
(inasmuch as it, indeed, at home). There
were steps, procedures that were becoming understandable. Somewhat. The research question is posed and tied to the
issue. It made sense to me that there
would be a back and forth in order to integrate components, because it has
seemed that preconceived notions are anathema to the qualitative
researcher. I like that so much! I think I might have a population that has
been most understudied. The students
with ADD, yes, but I have also been interested in those gifted students who
seem to have an unwarranted difficulty creating writing, especially narrative
writing. Might that be an area of research
for me?
The author continued to take each step of
research through all five types of studies.
The steps leading to the development of a purpose statement were
familiar from a study of single subject research design. The ensuing
identification of an approach, encoding, foreshadowing, and developing a
central question, sub-questions and
procedural questions, were, yes, somewhat understandable. Even encoding seemed to be something that I
might someday tackle. I have breathed a sigh of relief. Thank you, Mr. Creswell.
Jonnie,
ReplyDeleteWow, I like that while you read chapters 4-6 you "think of a qualitative research idea that interests" you. I did that too but didn't come out as good as your idea. I also like a lot of your questions associated with each approach such as "Might I develop a theoretical model and relate it to the research I have done about secondary students trying to cope with post-secondary education settings?" and "Would I spend months or years immersed in a subculture?". I believe that these questions will actually help you develop your research or finding an appropriate approach for your research. Remember that Creswell suggested that we start our selecting process for an approach with the outcome. I think you questions link directly to the possible outcome you want. So, I would suggest that you write down your thought and questions you may have. It may work or it may not. Anyway, let me know what you think. Also, could you please elaborate more why "the idea that each type of study involved a special type of focus was causing me to become a bit more focused"? We may be able to help you if you know what it is that you confuse.
Lastly, I like how you express your opinion and thought in your blog. I enjoy reading it. Thanks for your work.